« The one I swore I'd never write | Main | Four months (translation: one month) »

What makes and what breaks

I must fess up. We’re broke, but spoiled.

Since I don't qualify for maternity benefits (one of few freelancing downsides) Justin is on paternal leave, off work until sometime next spring to wrap us all in full-time, glorious daddyness. Another gift from Liam: even though we’ll be broke — beyond broke, just having inflated our mortgage with the ORANGE! renovation — we're both struck with a sudden conviction that (cliché #1) life is short; (cliché #2) life gave us lemons; and (cliché #3) all we need is love.

We tackle this infanthood + toddlerhood, both a trial and some kind of sweet, magical dream, holding hands. Bleary and gnawing at financial fingernails but together, elbow-deep in diapers and fishsticks and bike-pedalling, fart-promoting leg exercises (that would be for the baby, for the uninitiated).

So yes, I’m living in la la land when I speak of the second child being as easy as a chia pet. This has not escaped me.

We divide and conquer in this exquisitely Canadian, government-sponsored arrangement. Cheques with a ‘Q’, small but significant, are delivered every two weeks by a contingent of mounties who come bearing survival packs of maple syrup and poutine and La Maudite beer.

It's not much, but it keeps the power company and the credit card barons at bay while we play with trains and get peed on, often simultanously.

Yesterday, two months after we sprung from the NICU, I spent my first unassisted day with two children. Wait. Stop. Nowhere close. The first evening, better put. The first latter section of evening. After my parents picked Evan up from playschool and gave him supper, me racing against traffic to get Ben home from routine bloodwork and prescription pickup.

(I feel like the world’s most overindulged flake to admit all this, knowing so many of you out there care for multiple offspring on your own from the getgo — especially you federally abandoned, just-delivered, 6-week-crunched American comrades).

So there I was, left to get Evan to bed while also looking after Ben.

AT THE SAME TIME.

The stuff of everyday for you, perhaps, but near-Olympic for me.

Ben scrabbled for my bosom in the mei-tai wrap, scootching down while I squished myself up like when you pull up to the gas station and turn off the ignition too far from the pump. All the while fishing for runaway blind brown trout, bent over the bathtub while Evan wailed at the indignity of… well, being a toddler. And then, shortly thereafter, Ben wailing at the indignity of enduring neglect-o-matic #1 while I ran through 'If You Give a Moose a Muffin' for Evan like an over-caffeinated auctioneer.

But I did it. Delayed competence but competence nonetheless, even if it’s half-effectiveness with one and half-effectiveness with the other.

Evan down for the count, I nurse Ben into oblivion and put him in contraption #2 to cook garlic in a scoop of butter, then add super-stinky stilton, vermouth, devon cream and parmesan. It simmers for gnocchi while last night’s salmon heats up in the oven, and then I chop tomatoes and basil. And that’s supper, fishsticks be dammed. I am not a good cook but I am improvisational, and I bankrupt us on groceries, and I happen to, by complete accident, know what Japanese panko crumbs are and where to buy them. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, but like so many things, you may as well try.

The effort of it makes me human again, sitting here reflecting with you, on my second glass of cheap red wine and my fifteenth chocolate animal cracker, as Ben snores next to me in contraption #3.

Crunchy, silky, passable competence.


Posted on Saturday, September 8, 2007 by Registered Commentersweetsalty kate in | Comments68 Comments

Reader Comments (68)

I have been reading your blog for a month or so and I must say I adore your writing.Witty, raw, occasionally cynical, yet always delicious.Thank you for sharing your life with us.

Aubreywww.bandofhooligans.blogspot.com



September 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAubrey
wow how very wonderful for you all to have this unabashed time of togetherness. i was blessed with a work from home hubby for our second, but now he is a back to the office guy and we had a third. so i certainly know the glory of having those extra hands and hugs and teamwork. so soak it all in . cozy up all winter long and relish in it. good for you all.
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterkristin
I am so glad Justin gets this time off with the boys. How GREAT is that! And government sponsored! That has to be one of the most wonderful things I’ve heard of.

I am afraid I am one of the many “federally abandoned, just-delivered, 6-week-crunched American comrades”. My husband took a short paternal leave with our youngest daughter. We didn’t get a check, just a guilt trip. So enjoy and bask in your “Daddyness.” No one deserves it more.

September 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterWen
Good for you! Go on ahead and eat another dozen chocolate animal crackers. We won't tell.
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMelissa
Also a six-week crunched American here. Six weeks should be illegal. I thought it the first time and thought it even more the second. It sucks. Enjoy your time together as a family. I'll add a cliche or two into your mix: you'll never get this time back and it's going to seem like it goes faster than it did the first time around. Live for today.
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSusan
How awesome that you all get to keep Justin for yourselves in this time of healing and living. I think it's wonderful that he gets to take so much time off; as it should be, since you so damn well deserve it. As for your bits and pieces of solo-parenting here and there, doesn't it ever-amaze you just how much one can accomplish when put to the task? I laughed at this post; indeed, I find myself in those throws often when my husband travels for work. I often wish I could subdivide; later at night, alone amidst the quiet, I reflect that indeed, I DID. As long as each kid goes to bed fed, clean, with brushed teeth, and love of some sort, I feel as though my job was done. Well done by you, too. (Your 'contraptions' are a hoot!) Enjoy your vino and...ahem...animal crackers :).

September 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJoanna
Dinner sounds delicious. Is the neglect-o-matic the swing? That's what I call mine.Ps I'm spoiled too, Its still hard.
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterlisa b
That sounded in there like a guilty pleasure admission, but DO NOT feel as though you need to feel guilty because you're intimidated by the daunting task of watching two of them at the same time. I don't know how anybody really does it. A lot of half competence with each, I guess! Enjoy the heck out of Justin being home for so long. It's a blessing very well deserved.And I sure as heck wish I were eating dinner at YOUR house tonight. That sounds DIVINE!
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTrasi
it sounds absolutely delicious. something straight out of Billie Holiday's mouth, poor, but love.
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterjen
good job.

don't the never ending contraptions make life so much easier?

enjoy your hubby.

money is way over rated ;)
September 8, 2007 | Unregistered Commentererin
I'm totally overwhelmed when I'm home alone with my 20-month-old son. My excuse is that I'm hugely pregnant. I have no idea how I'll cope when his sister is born. :) Love the post.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterCheryl
Every single day here at the farm with children is just barely passable competence on my part. I'm not very good at any of it, but it gets done.

Dh has said that if more people were doing what we're doing, they would cease to be amazed at us and realize that we're just a couple of slackers.

Oh, and he works from home in an attached shop, so if I need an extra pair of hands to, say, change a disgusting diaper or help wrangle an escapee goat or two, I've got it. It's good to be spoiled.

Your dinner sounds yummy! I puffy heart gnocchi and refuse to share.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAlison (in OH)
Oh this makes me laugh! I understand the chaos that comes with two. My favorite is the chain reaction of crying that springs up and bubbles over until I can do is sit and laugh and feel helpless.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSyndi
Kate:

I'm glad to see this post, because I'm hoping that all your six-week-crunched American readers will start fighting for change in their country.

With all the tragedy and heartbreak you've faced this year, you still have the opportunity to be together, to heal together, to resume this bittersweet dance called life together. And that's because you're not facing bankruptcy, and that's because Canada has universal health care.

You didn't have to fight some anonymous HMO for continued coverage, or re-mortgage your house to pay the NICU bill. And right now, Justin can enjoy our glorious fall and (hopefully!) quiet winter with you and the boys; he doesn't have to hold down three jobs to keep the financial wolves from howling your door.

I don't like getting all political on your blog, or highjacking this thread. But it bothers me every day that the world's wealthiest country doesn't set an example for all of us. Independence is easy. Interdependence is hard. I want our American cousins to see the beauty in caring for everyone, to understand the strength that comes from compassion and kindness.

As a man who lost his youth caring for an elderly parent, I know that the Canadian health care system has serious flaws. But it takes care of all of us during our times of greatest need.

I'm glad that it's been there — to take care of you, and Liam, and Ben. Now it will be there again, offering you the chance to heal together as a family.

Amen, for such a profound blessing.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRichard
Lovely post. Thank you. Although I am now seriously craving poutine and as I am in Scotland I am probably a few thousand miles from the nearest place I could get some. (Poutine being the kind of food Scottish people can get seriously keen on - we deep fry Mars bars over here after all!)
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLoth
Another six-week crunched American, but happy for you. You deserve AT LEAST this, time with your family, time to appreciate the accomplishment of caring for your boys all on your own. It is an accomplishment. And the first time you do it, it feels like you're taking a leap off a giant cliff, figuring you'll land okay if you just trust yourself.

It gets easier, by the way, caring for two. I say this with very little experience, but growing more confident every day, caring for my 7-week-old & 20-month-old. My husband got TWO WHOLE DAYS off work when our youngest was born. I felt like I'd been tossed to the wolves at first, but less so now. And occasionally, rarely, I feel like a wolf tamer, like a good mom, and that feeling is truly awesome.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterErin
The six week crunch is just CRUEL to American moms, that's for sure. I'm blessed to be broke but home 24-7 with my 3 yr old and 11 month old.

Panko ROCKS! Especially on tilapia. Mmmmm. Food is sacred around here. No scrimping!

Caring for two IS easier. Ben will learn so much from Evan and become completely devoted to following Evan's every move that you'll begin to feel second dairy. haha. get it?

Need coffee.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJennboree
Yes, yet another shout to our American friends on here: I just can't believe that the US government doesn't put greater value on parenthood, and on enabling new moms and dads to get their feet under them, to enjoy this time, to heal, to learn, to be the best parents they can be.

It just doesn't make sense. It seems so heartless, as though every US politician must be a non-breeding alien to not be filled with outrage and immediate action.

And I'll second Richard's rant in an interesting way: the whole notion of the cost of healthcare had, actually, never crossed my mind until this very second.

The cost of two months (times two) in the NICU, Ben's extended outpatient care.. all of it. I can't even comprehend having to think at all about who would pay for it, or how.

Our system has its flaws, but after all the torment we've been through, it really says something that I haven't thought once about hospital bills.

Just got the most amazing email from Liza, a fellow TTTS and NICU mama, who detailed her mountain-moving, epic issues with paying for their trauma. And she was lucky.

Really.. it had never crossed my mind until now. Amazing.

And to everyone else, I am relieved to hear it gets less intimidating to look after two at once. I'm on my second full day, today, and I haven't had to stick Evan to our velcro restraining wall even once.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commentersweetsalty kate
velcro restraining wall, indeed!

I still remember the first day my hubbie went back to work after our third was born--I had the six year old and the four year old, and by the end of the day I was completely over the edge with trying to pay attention to three--I put Jenny in the sling, put a big sweater over both of us, and walked up to the road to wait for hubby's homecoming, all sniffly and drippy and sad, but at least unencumbered, however momentarily. Then the front door opened, and I heard Katie shout--"I found her, Joel! Come on! Hurry up! She's crying, we need to go help her!"

It does get easier.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterKaren
Heh. This post brought back all kinds of memories for me about having to negotiate the competing needs of one four-year-old boy used to receiving 100 percent of my attention, and one very easygoing but still diaper-filling mama's mik-drinking babe.

Our neglect-o-matic was the bouncy seat, which I'm certain I overused. When Jack was four months old (and perhaps 18-20 pounds -- yes, he was that large). I put him in that wondrous seat, yet again, and I watched as its top end sank to the ground, defeated by Jack's weight.

It was funny, except for the fact that there went one of my neglect-o-matics.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterslouching mom
that's milk, not mik.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterslouching mom
Kate--You'll find your comfort zone with handling the two boys on your own. Keep the tea handy and it will be fine.I remember the bleariness each day, and finally my awe at being able to tell Chris--I made dinner tonight when Ellen was just weeks old.I took four months off when I had her, and by American standards that was an over the top, even when I only returned for 12 hrs/ week thereafter. I am regarded as somewhat of a childrearing glutton here. Oh well!May cliche #4 be "it gets easier with each passing day."

September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJenn B
I think that the US is eventually coming around. I stay home and get nothing for maternity leave. However, David was able to take six weeks of paid leave when our youngest was born. He can take up to twelve weeks off without his job being able to say a thing, but the state will only pay him for six. Normally, he would just take two weeks of his vacation to stay home with me and I know I'm lucky for that alone!

Fortunately, the more children you have the more patient they are forced to be. Evan will understand more and more. He's just never really had to wait for anything, right?
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLeann I Am
Yeah, things kind of suck in the healthcare dept here at the moment. When I had Porter, the first day was spent in labor in a birthing room. The next day the "money people" came in to show me the incidentals that our insurance didn't cover and asked me how we were going to pay. I told them that my husband would be around at some point to talk to them, but at the moment I was not going to ... seeing that I just pushed a child out of my vagina and I couldn't think about anything properly except getting said child to latch on correctly. She went on about someone having to take care of it and I told her to get out. We checked out that day, having to choose to leave because of what the next day might cost. Alex got exactly one day more off with me and the baby and then I felt like I was thrown to the wolves until my mom came to visit two weeks later. But it got easier, or actually, I realized my limitations, and the bills got paid eventually. We don't go anywhere, we spend lots of time at home, but we never skimp on food ... or an occasional Thomas video (my contraption for the 2 year old). We'll see how it goes when #2 gets here ... for now you are my hero.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commentertanya
I have been reading you for a while now... I'm so proud of you..

Make sure you realise how far you have come and well you are doing. On your own for the first time is nerve wracking! I remember it well and mine was only for two and a half hours when one was already in bed!!! lol

You sound happy and.. that's nothing to be worried about..

big hugs... (from another cheque with a Q)

nm

September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenternutty mummy
I'm glad to hear that you and Justin are getting to enjoy each other at such a hard time. Isn't it amazing to find out you CAN do it yourself...take care of two kids. Before David went back to work (he took off one week while family took turns visiting) I had an afternoon in which I wouldn't let him help with the babies. It was so good for my self esteem to know I could do it myself.

I'm not one to talk politics...but I don't want the American government in control of my healthcare and don't expect them to take care of me. I don't want to be put on a waiting list for surgery needed today nor do I want to travel to another country to have to obtain healthcare I can't get here.

Back to why I read...glad you are happy and taking care of all your boys, Kate.

much love,ashley
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterashley in SC
way to go mom!

i just had my #2 and last night I was on my own the same way with both (minus the bath) and it felt so good to be able to do it, even though I was a little scared. I wanted to beat my chest and roar! we mamas rock! I love that last line you wrote, so true.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterliz
I am a mother of twins as well, and a faithful reader. Your words are beautiful and raw and so "right on".

I know the "broke but spoiled" feeling myself. I guess I'm lucky enough to be living a life where I have the luxery of recognizing that there are people and situations worse than my own. I mean, I'm not so challenged by life that I spend every day just trying to survive... Yeah, broke but spoiled, know that one well.

Your blog is very touching. Thanks for sharing.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMarie Green
@Ashley:

:::::Sorry, I'm going to be prickly here, but without meaning to offend. I just appreciate a good debate. :::::

You are repeating several myths about Canadian health care that have little basis in fact. Believe me, when I say that I understand the benefits and liabilities of our health care system far better most.

If you are very sick, if you have a life threatening illness, you receive immediate care. You don't wait. You don't have to go elsewhere. In 1994, when they found that I had a brain tumor, I wasn't put on a waiting list. I had CAT scans, MRIs, a battery of tests, and saw a neurosurgeon and an endocrinologist within days. Fortunately, it turned out to be benign, and it's still with me today. When I shattered my hand, and needed immediate plastic surgery to prevent me from losing the use of it, I was operated on within two days.*

But when I tore cartilage in my knee, a sore but hardly serious injury, I was put on a waiting list, and had surgery about four months later.

The Canadian system isn't as bad as you've been lead to believe. According to the WHO, Canada has the 30th best health care system in the world. The US ranks 37th. Ours is cheaper on a per capita basis, covers everyone in the country, and creates — generally speaking — a healthier population.

But it sure ain't perfect. I am hoping for radical reform to our health care system in the coming years, to better cope with the influx of aging baby boomers, and to promote health care instead of crisis management. Something more like France, perhaps.

I really don't have a problem with people who prefer the American system. But I did want to set the record straight.

It's great that you're so self-sufficient. I hope that it is always so.

But I'm glad that I live here.

___________*My experiences with the hand injury and the brain tumor happened in the year after I lost my job, when my employer fired me for getting sick. Had I lived in the US, I wouldn't have had much in the way of health coverage, and would probably still be paying it off.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRichard
I'll never complain "too much" about our health care system after watching my mother die of cancer. We would have been without my mother, and bankrupt. the drugs alone cost more than I care to imagine.

On the other hand, my experiences with American practitioners was eyeopening. Treated as a customer? As in, nicely? What a weird thing! :)

We couldn't afford to go down to half our income, but I'm so glad you guys are able to pull it off. Being home together must be so nice after all you've been through.

mmm panko....
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterthordora
What time's dinner? Mmmm...sounds delish!Jeff stayed home with me and baby #3 for 1 week after she was born 18 months ago.It was the sweetest time for us as a couple and the relationship he formed with our daughter is precious. Enjoy each other...and your little family bubble...spoiling each other is both allowed and necessary.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEmily
Velcro restraining wall? Where can I get one? Do they ship to the US? ( :) )
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJoanna
Despite having really, really good insurance through my job, I was paying hospital bills for a year after my son was born. Well, half of the letters were bills and the others were refunds for overpayment and then more bills and then more...you get the idea. The last bill was a doozy. I still hold out a little hope for a refund. Maybe when he's two I'll get it.
September 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAurelia
Richard, no offense taken. And thanks for the information about your healthcare system that I admittedly did not know. I hope my post did not offend anyone -- that certainly was not my intent. I believe those that need help should get it and not feel guilty about it. Time with family is certainly more precious than money.

Our system is definitely not perfect and not sympathetic for those without insurance. I agree with your dislike for HMO's -- they are the devil at work along with trial lawyers and our evergrowing litigious (spelling?) society. Our politicians don't have to deal with "real world" healthcare...don't have to worry about being denied services, "in network v. out of network" doctors, etc. I have a pretty colorful medical history and have had many phone calls, petition meetings with insurance companies and credit companies. In the first five years of my marriage my husband and I have faced $30,000 + in my medical bills alone (NICU bills are another story)....payment plans upon payment plans.

Our maternity/paternity laws aren't too nice to healing mamas and adjusting papas. I don't know of many women whose bodies have completely healed six weeks after giving birth. I agree with Leann in that the US seems to be coming around slowly. I took 12 weeks off without pay and returned to work for one month. My daughter refused a bottle at daycare so I became a stay at home mom...which was what I wanted anyway. We now fit in the "broke but spoiled" category as well.

I know that I am fortunate to be able to stay at home with my twins though we do live month to month as so many others do. I hope I didn't come across as a snot...one who looks down at others for accepting help. I don't feel that way at all and am not above asking for help when I need it.

Once again, I am not one to talk politics. My grandfather taught me long ago "You don't talk politics or religion." Those are two topics that evoke both passion and anger. Who am I to say who is right or wrong?

Sorry to sabotage your beautiful blog, Kate! I am so glad you are not having to deal with medical bills. Enjoy your time with your family and don't dare feel guilty about it.

much love,ashley



September 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterashley in SC
While I am seriously not as much of a hard-ass as this comment is going to make me sound like I am, I kind of understand the American system of shorter maternity/paternity leaves. Businesses have to compete today in a market where companies in places like China and India get away with paying their people so little, and providing them even less in the way of benefits. So much is getting outsourced to countries where the standard of living is so much below what we have in America (and Canada, for that matter, as well as Europe). With that for competition, how can a business afford to lose their staff (both male and female) for MONTHS at a time due to having a child? It is a luxury that many businesses cannot afford. If a person is valuable in their job, which you'd expect them to be if they are paid money to do it, how can the business afford to continue to leave that position open in order for its occupant to be at home for months?I fully agree on a personal level that it must be wonderful to have both parents at home for an extended period of time with a new baby to get adjusted. But I cannot look harshly on companies which cannot afford to offer that.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTrasi
Everyone's made good points.. Ben's just about to wake up so I can't string coherent thoughts together. Just want to say that I never mind debate, especially when it's done with such grace and respect. Very cool.

And Trasi, just so you know - maternity leaves in Canada open up great opportunities for contract work, and companies suffer no downtime because of it. The norm is to take a year off (although not everyone does), during which time the company hires a replacement. Usually the outgoing mama and the incoming replacement spend a couple of weeks shadowing each other, for training, and beyond that it's pretty seamless.

For people trying to break into an industry or company, the option to cover for a new mama during a mat leave with a yearlong stint is fantastic. So it works well for everyone. Many companies, particularly the government, even have a top-up program, so that the leave-taker gets EI at 55% of their salary, and then the company pays them the rest to bump their income up to full salary for the entire year. Those jobs are highly desireable for people our age - to know that you can take a fully-paid mat leave is pretty amazing. That's a way that companies attract more talent, from an HR perspective, by offering top-up. (Justin's organization doesn't, unfortunately... I wish!)

September 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commentersweetsalty kate
Thanks, Ashley, for being so gracious! I have been feeling guilty for making Kate's blog so political.

And Kate, thanks for the detailed explanation about maternity leave. You've made the same points that I wanted to make.

Our system of health care — with universal coverage and a one-year maternity leave — is a national strength, not a weakness. Smart businesses are able to hire the best people, and those people are impressed by the company's values, so they work hard for them, and go the extra mile (he wrote, resorting to a cliché). Often what happens when a man or woman returns from their one-year leave, the company decides that both employees are valuable, and finds another job for the interim worker. (Admittedly, I just have anecdotal evidence for that).

It works so well for everyone. This is the way things are done in many European countries, and I think it would work really well in the USA, too. (My partner is from Maine). The USA can afford it. All you need is the political will.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRichard
I was lucky enough with my first child to be able to go on maternity leave, but with the second I won't (a mix of no daycare to begin with, and now a new city with not enough time to get a job before giving birth). Because of the nature of my husband's position (contract) he won't be able to get pat leave, but I'm hoping that he'll be able to 'work from home' like he did the first three weeks after Atticus was born (when he was completely self-employed).

We're going back to BC to give birth because I'm due the night a play Kevin is directing is opening (and he has to be there for a month before for rehearsals) and also because midwifery care isn't covered by Alberta's medical. Because we're both artists and very much 'broke but spoiled' the idea of having to pay $3500 to give birth seems outrageous to me. I know what that must sound like to the American readers!

And to get away from the mat leave discussion, I am terrified at the thought of having to care for a newborn and a toddler all by myself! I hope you and Justin and the boys enjoy and cherish his year of pat leave. What a wonderful gift to your family.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterm
Interesting info on the Canadian health care system here. M, indeed: 3500.00 sounds like a dream. I paid close to $10,000 for each child - normal labor and delivery, in hospital, with an epidural, and 48 hour stay. That's $30,000 of baby delivery in four years. Fortunately, my DH's insurance covered all but 1500.00 of that. I think I want to move to Canada. (Not to mention that, plus the scenery!)
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJoanna
Whoa. Thanks for taking the blinders off, guys. I'm a 26-year-old apparently sorely uninformed college grad/American citizen. I've never even HEARD of a year-long maternity or paternity leave, much less considered that families deserve more than 6 weeks. Then I had Traci's thought, then Traci beat me to it, then I learned about this sweet top-up thing. I guess I should be first in line for Sicko...
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBetsy
more people would be able to do what justin and kate are doing if less emphasis was placed on consumption by everyone---both americans and canadians. we buy the biggest houses we can afford, we fill them with things we don't need. we get caught in desperate economic traps of our own making: "no payments for 12 months!" on 42" (that's 100 cm for you canadians) HD plasma tvs, credit card minimum payments, multiple car payments, utility bills for the empty rooms in mcmansions. I'm surprised people have turned the political discussion here into the tired old Canada-versus-US health care debate, without acknowledging this post really seems to be about is the opportunity to stay home and spend time with your kids. Sadly, for most people I know there is a simple necessity to jump right back into the workforce in order to pay for all their things. most people quickly figure out that their kids are more important than their things, but for many it's already too late.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterdutch from sweet juniper
It isn't always about "things" either, dutch. Because of the sucky healthcare system here, families often must also care and provide for loved ones such as mothers, grandparents, etc.

I have supplemental insurance (none include maternity) because it is so friggin expensive for my husband to carry our children as it is. We forked out $12,000+ last year for my c-section to deliver our daughter.

We Americans ARE often all about having "things" but I also think there are many other reasons so few can stay home to raise their children when they want to.

We need change and that will be a huge issue with Presidential candidates, none of whom have impressed me much with their ideas.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMy Two Cents
My girlfriend's husband just took a month of paternity leave to be home with his wife, new baby and two older girls at summer's end. I was completely envious.

I loved this post. It brought back so many memories of trying to put my then-two-year-old to bed, with a newborn perpetually stuck to my breast.

Thank God for multiple contraptions.

September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJanet
Dutch:

Of course, you've scored a perfect 10, making a point that I decided not to make — having hijacked the thread in the first place. I hate the consumerism rampant in North American society today, and make a concerted effort to buy wisely. It's one of the purest and simplest ways that I can create the change that I want to see it in the world. It started 20 years ago when I first bought fair trade coffee, and now it percolates (oh, did I really write that?) through every decision that I make as a consumer.

And yes, I drive family members nuts, although I do try to put people before my politics.

I believe this debate is helpful. Look how many Sweet | Salty readers had no idea that such a liberal maternity-leave policy was even possible. Betsy had never heard of paternity leave before. Trasi wonders how American companies could ever afford to pay for a year-long parental leave when jobs are flying overseas.

I think about commenting again, suggesting that most Canadian and American corporations exist in the same international marketplace, and perhaps companies supporting families will have a competitive edge.

But I don’t have to, because Kate says exactly that, explaining why it's such a simple, elegant solution for Canadian families, and how it’s good corporate policy, too. Do you think that a few expectant American couples will be talking about parental leave tonight at dinner, and do you think that might be a very good thing?

Kate, Justin, Evan and Ben are going to have a wonderfully rich life for the better part of a year because the Canadian government places more value on families than the current American administration. You might disagree. You might think that it's an old debate, and you’d be right. But as long as we create more heat than light, I’ll keep making the tired arguments. And that’s because you have an election approaching, and I don’t think it’s hyperbole to suggest that the entire world will be watching.

What kind of world do you want to live in? You laid down a compelling vision, one that I can embrace easily. I long for a more egalitarian society. And I value the work that Kate and Justin are doing with their young family, just as you do. The difference is that some of the taxes that I pay will go towards supporting the Inglis family over the next year — and other families like theirs.

I don’t begrudge them one cent. In fact, I’m proud to contribute, even in such a small way. Stronger families make for a better world. Fifteen years ago, Kate worked at a local coffee shop that I frequented. I knew then that she was going to be a great mother. Sweet | Salty tells me that I wasn’t wrong. This post tells me that I wasn’t wrong.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRichard
your words make me feel better about the crazy way we traub's do things here in our lives. my ed has been SO present in these past 7 years while i birthed these four blessings and now the youngest is two and i am breathing... and mostly because ed showed up (often) in our lives. most of the time we didn't do it on purpose, but other times we chose to. we tend to fight the typical ways society goes about things and opt for less grandeur and more simplicity. it has kept and sustained me... and i am so thankful. i love that you are embracing and loving it all. you are a great mama and justin an awesome dada and the pair of you - well, it's better done (like WAY more fun) together! cheers to you both. :) reminds me of one of my favorite jack johnson songs - better when we're together... now it'll be stuck in my head all day.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterHeather ~ Traub Tribe
I've became a SAHM out of necessity the first time around. Once we found out that our son not only had Down syndrome but would need heart surgery before his first birthday, there was just no way we could follow our original plan to have someone else look after him. Who (and we are in California) wants to take in a heart patient at their daycare? Ha! And, if they had wanted him, would we have wanted them? I was afraid that the people that would be willing would be people that would not understand the magnitude of what they were being asked to do. When the cardiologist gives you a list of things to look out for (including "crying for no apparent reason that cannot be calmed" -- uh, isn't that what newborns are always doing?) and says that if anything on the list happens jump in the car and get to the E.R., don't wait for an ambulance, well... ha! Just whose hands could I put him in other than mine? So, tada, instant SAHM, first-time mom, with mega stress.

So, now that he's 2yo and we have handled 4 hospital stays, am I such a pro that adding a little sister to our family was no big deal? No! Scared the crap outta me. She's 4mo and I have yet to take them both out without bringing another adult along as well. I have managed (thanks to contraptions!) to take care of them alone, but my husband is now working from home so it is MUCH easier.

And the bills? I don't even want to talk about it. Too depressing. After reading the comments here I want to move to Vancouver more than ever. Sigh. Will you Canadians take me in if I promise to learn to spell your way? :-)
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterKYouell
okay, i am SO silly. i never read what everyone else has commented until AFTER i have posted and WOW! this is some GOOD, eye-opening conversation going on here! i appreciate all that you guys have put out there for us (kate, richard... and all). i love LOVED what KYouell just said about moving to vancouver! couldn't help but giggle. :) i have learned my lesson and will read to the bottom from now on. thanks for the hearty read on the different health care systems. being informed is the best gift ever. thanks to you.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterHeather ~ Traub Tribe
It's been a very interesting debate to read and partake in, although that surely wasn't what Kate intended with this post. I'm not sure I am convinced that paying for an extensive maternity leave plus contract labor for one job is truly an affordable financial scenario for many businesses... but I do understand the point that the area in which a business competes for key talent drives them to offer "better benefits" to lure and maintain the talent. That still does not make the company competitive internationally, and we see hundreds of thousands of jobs moving overseas because of it. That saddens me, but I can understand the bottom line of it.As is true with everything, there are many facets and sides to every story, and usually they all have at least a little bit of merit.
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTrasi
Two in the hand - solo. It is the taste and feeding of all that lies ahead. I remember being nervous and half; but you find your rhythm.. after a few 'I draw in your bed' and what not.

Despite what Dutch has had to add I am glad the red serge stayed in. That you can rest in what someone else said 'money is way overrated' but still have a hot meal while you write it.

Maybe it ain't some old debate but a viable difference? I know he is usually so picture perfect at argument but that comment had me bleary eyed at this hour. Wondering if being a Canadian is a hologram, my passport available for pick up in a comic shop? That cannot be what he meant?
September 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commentermo-wo
One year maternity/paternity leave sounds like a dream come true! Is that offered in all workplaces..like the public schools? gas station workers? or is it just offered in multimillion dollar corporations?

I'm glad that Dutch reminded me that this post has been interesting it is about family and how it should be more important than materialism.

I'm still not sold on having the federal government in charge of my health care.
September 11, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterashley in SC

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.